关键词 > MGMT7250

MGMT7250 2 - Action Briefing Semester 1, 2024

发布时间:2024-05-24

Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

MGMT7250

Assessment Brief:

TASK: 2 - Action Briefing

TEACHING PERIOD: Semester 1, 2024

DUE DATES:  Format selection: Thursday Week 10 by 23:59

Submission:

i) Live briefing:

Slides uploaded: the earlier of Thursday of Week 12 by 23:59,

or before presenting.

Presentation: Thursday or Friday of Week 12 (day and time to be advised)

ii) Written:   Thursday of Week 12 by 23:59

SIZE LIMIT:  i) Live briefing:

Slides: 6 slides, plus slides for references;

Time: 6 minutes plus time for questions from the marker; allow 10-15 minutes in total).

ii) Written: 600 words

SUBMISSION:  i) Live briefing:

Slides: via Turnitin on Wattle

Presentation: via Zoom (link will be provided with advice of day and time) ii) Written: via Turnitin on Wattle

COLLABORATION:  Nil. This individual submission must be entirely your own work.

WEIGHT:  30%

LEARNING OUTCOMES: 2,3,5,6,7

PURPOSE: This is part of a series of submissions that assess a student’s capacities to

forward a problem through to evidence-based decisions. This assessment item applies concepts drawn from the Aggregate, Apply, and Assess phases of the  EBD process as well as from the Ask, Acquire and Appraise phases.

DESCRIPTION: A business report that proposes a pathway to resolve the previously defined management problem.

RETURN OF FEEDBACK:  Up to 10 working days after submission, excluding semester breaks


REQUIREMENTS:

1. Select the format – Students may choose either of the following formats using the Format Selection link provided on Wattle for this purpose.

.    i) Live briefing:  A live presentation made individually to the marker online, supported by slides, and followed by answers to questions from the marker; this online session will be recorded. Students must upload their slides and any extra slides required for a reference list to Wattle prior to their live presentation. Students who select this option should also advise any other commitments during the presentation period. This is so that their presentation can be scheduled to avoid those commitments.

.    ii) Written report: A business report.

Note that students who do not make a selection by the specified time and date will be deemed to have selected format ii) – written report.

2. Describe the action to betaken:  In the selected format, aggregate and appraise the evidence gathered, and then apply it in planning implementation of appropriate action.

STRUCTURE AND CONTENTS:

There is no set structure, but the following content is to be covered and the structure you select should meet the purpose of communicating with senior management. If not using a supplied case study, anonymise the name of the organisation. Note that requirements for two tables are specified. Other tables or appendices supplied will not be assessed.

ITEM

COVERAGE

WEIGHTING

Problem definition

.   Define the problem including brief background and context for the problem.

.   Justify the report using at least one of the four forms of evidence used in Evidence-Based Management.

10%

Aggregation of

evidence

.   Summarise and appraise the findings from the evidence previously obtained.

.   Discuss the degree of consistency or inconsistency between the sources of evidence.

.   Aggregate the evidence to address the problem.

.   For scientific evidence, provide a table that shows no information other than the citation for each article, the trustworthiness of the article, the

aggregated trustworthiness of the body of articles and any notes relevant to each individual assessment of trustworthiness.

20%

Decision

.   Present options and document the decision-making process

20%

Recommendations

.   Provide a logic model in a table summarising the problem and/or

intervention; no content irrelevant to the logic model will be accepted.

.   Recommend the actions required to apply the evidence to the problem.

20%

Implementation

issues

.   Identify constraints, potential problems, stakeholder concerns, and any     other matters to be considered in implementing the recommendations(s).

10%

Assessment

.   Propose measures and timeline for undertaking assessment of recommended actions

.   Discuss potential problems that may occur in undertaking the assessment

20%

References

.   A reference list of all materials cited is required.

-


Note: The relative weightings of the items of coverage gives you guidance on their relative importance for assessment, and therefore how to focus your effort. You can use this to help plan your work by using the  weightings to allocate your time and the approximate number of words to each item. Proper referencing is a Submission Requirement (see separate section for details) and therefore has no weighting in this table, but not meeting that requirement will impact your assessment.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & ACADEMIC STANDARDS:

The Class Summary includes guidance on ANU's expectations for academic standards and integrity.  See also the detailed Assessment Submission Standards advised in the Getting Started guide on the Wattle page; advice on presentation of written and other material is also provided there.

Your submissions should also meet the following requirements:

All entries in the reference list should include their electronic link; for example, the DOI for articles or the ISBN for books.

i) If submitting a live briefing:

Slide file format: Submit a single file containing the slides in Powerpoint (PPT) format. Slide file name: Name your file in accordance with the following format:

MGMT7250-u#######-2 , where ####### is your own ANU ID

Live briefing: Zoom - the link and scheduled day and time of presentation will be emailed to students. ii) If submitting a written report:

Report file format: Submit a single file containing the entire submission in DOCX format. Report file name: Name your submission in accordance with the following format:

MGMT7250-u#######-2 , where ####### is your own ANU ID

MARKING:

The Marking Criteria in this Brief will be used to assess submitted work against the Learning Outcomes.