关键词 > BEX3000

BEX 3000 - Professional Development for Business

发布时间:2024-05-23

Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

BEX 3000 - Professional Development for Business

Report

Value

The report accounts for 40% of your total marks for the unit. It is directly connected to the following assessment tasks:

- Research Plan

Assessment task purpose

You, as an external consultant, will write a 1000-word report for the Board identifying the 3 most important issues for the company going forward based on its Australian operations. Your report includes evidence as to why these 3 issues have been chosen. Your report will provide advice on what the company should do in order to improve in these 3 key areas, along with supporting reasons for the suggested courses of action.

Learning Outcomes

2. Synthesise high quality industry information (reports, publications, statistics) to provide relevant business insights and make informed decisions

3. Analyse and evaluate business related inputs in order to identify areas of growth, differentiation and improvement

4. Communicate in written and verbal form to produce professional artefacts

Your assessment task

Your report should be concise and can be written, where beneficial, in dot points. It should have a professional design and layout that is tailored to its intended audience, the board.

Text should be 12pt, double spaced and submitted as either a Word Document of PDF.

Word Limit & conditions

1000 words plus an appendix. The appendix can be large. The appendix should be a written document synthesising the main supporting evidence. While there is no minimum or maximum length, it would be expected that it will be around 5000 words.

Due Date

Friday 11.55PM in Week 12

Submission

● Via Moodle Assignment Submission.

● Turnitin will be used for similarity checking of all submissions.

Assessment Criteria

You will be assessed on your ability to demonstrate the following:

- Analyse and evaluate of business related inputs

- Synthesize information

- Produce professional communication

Late Penalties

● 10% deduction per calendar day or part thereof for up to one week

● Submissions more than 7 calendar days after the due date will receive a mark of zero (0) and may not receive assessment feedback

Feedback

Feedback will be provided on student work via:

● general cohort performance

● specific student feedback ten working days post submission

INSTRUCTIONS

You will carry out your research plan in order to submit a high quality professional report to the board. Your research plan identified 3 issues to conduct more detailed research on. Use the feedback you received to inform your next steps. You might find, upon conducting deeper research on one of the issues, that the available information is insufficient. You can then go back to the additional issues your team identified and preliminarily researched and select one of them instead.

For each of the 3 issues you need to address:

-      What it is

-      What is causing it/ What its ramifications are (with evidence)

-      What can be done to rectify it (include evidence for your chosen strategy if possible)

You may also identify other areas to include so as to offer a more comprehensive report. Your report has a word limit of 1000 words +/-10%, however, you are able to include an appendix, and can reference its inclusions in your report.

RUBRIC

Learning Objectives & Criteria

HD (80-100%)

Demonstration of extended

knowledge, skills and attributes at an exceptional level, showing

fluency, originality and integration of concepts

D (70-79%)

Demonstration of extended

knowledge, skills and attributes at a superior level, showing fluency and  emerging originality and integration  of concepts.

C (65-74%)

Demonstration of fundamental

knowledge, skills and attributes at a proficient level, showing fluency in   concepts.

P (50-59%)

Demonstration of fundamental

knowledge, skills and attributes at a satisfactory level.

N (0-49%)

Lack of satisfactory demonstration of fundamental knowledge, skills   and expected attributes.

Identify 3 key areas which  you think are important for the company and provide   evidence for your choice.   40%

Clearly demonstrates evidence of expert, critical and highly

systematic evaluation of

business needs in order to

accurately identify distinct,

meaningful and impactful

issues, which are clearly and accurately supported by high quality research.

Clearly demonstrates evidence  of critical and highly systematic evaluation of business needs in

order to identify distinct,

meaningful and impactful

issues, which are well

supported by high quality

research.

Produces evidence of a critical evaluation of business needs   with the aim of identifying

distinct, meaningful and

impactful issues, which are supported by high quality   research.

Produces an adequate

evaluation of business needs with the aim of identifying

relevant issues, which are  supported with satisfactory research.

Produces a disconnected,

incomplete, or insufficient

evaluation of business needs

with a limited number and range of sources.

Synthesise high quality

industry information (reports, publications, statistics) to

provide relevant business   insights and make informed decisions

30%

The report presents the issues  concisely and comprehensively, with clear, actionable and

insightful courses of action

provided. High quality sources of evidence are used

throughout

The report presents the issues concisely and/or

comprehensively, with clear and actionable courses of action

provided. High quality sources of evidence are used

throughout

The report presents the issues  effectively, with valid courses of action provided. Some high

quality sources of evidence are used.

The report presents the issues adequately, with attempts to

provide meaningful courses of   action. Few high quality sources of evidence are used.

The report communicates

information or ideas with limited

clarity and may lack the

inclusion of all elements. Very few if any high quality sources of evidence are used.

Communicate in written form to produce professional

artefacts

30%

Exploits the conventions of the  discipline to communicate at an

expert level, with highly

developed skills in structure, flow and presentation of

content. All sources are

appropriately acknowledged with consistent & accurate

referencing.

Exploits the conventions of the discipline to communicate at a professional level, with

well-developed skills in

structure, flow and presentation

of content. Sources are

appropriately acknowledged

with a high level of accuracy in referencing.

Uses the conventions of the

discipline to communicate at an effective level, with adequate

skills in structure, flow and

presentation of content.

Sources are appropriately   acknowledged with minor    inaccuracies in referencing.

Uses some of the conventions

of the discipline to communicate appropriately, with basic skills in structure and presentation of

content. Sources are

acknowledged with some minor inaccuracies in referencing.

Has inadequate skills in

presentation of content, and structure.

Some sources are not

acknowledged, and there are major inaccuracies in

referencing.