关键词 > LSE7140
LSE7140 Law, Liberty and Morality 2023-2024
发布时间：2024-05-17
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
2023-2024
Master of Arts in Ethics and Public Affairs
LSE7140 Law, Liberty and Morality
Short Assignment (10%)
1. Short Assignment (10%)
Deadline: 17 May 2023 at 23:59 (Marks will be deducted for late submission)
Failure to hand in on or before 23:59 on 17 May 2023 will be considered as late.
Weighting: 10% of the total marks
Submission Method: Via Moodle
Submit your Short Assignment to the collection box in Moodle and Turnitin is required.
File Format: Word Document (PDF file will not be accepted)
Requirements of Similarity: Less than 20%
Language: English
Font: 12 size of Times New Roman
Spacing: Double line spacing
Word Limit: 1000 - 1200 words in total. You actually can exceed 10% of the word limit. Please indicate the total word count in your paper. You can allocate the number of words for each question by yourselves. Exceeded words in your paper may not be marked and this surely will affect your marks. Proper quotations are required. Footnotes and references are required. But neither footnotes nor reference list would be included in the word-count.
Citation Format: Chicago Style (Notes and Bibliography System)
This is the Chicago Guide provided by the University Library. If you are not familiar with the Style, please have a look on it. The link:https://hkbu.libguides.com/citation/chicago)
NOTE: All kinds of plagiarism and the using of AI technologies, e.g. ChatGPT, are not allowed. If plagiarism is found, your work will be marked as fail.
LSE7140 Law, Liberty and Morality (For Reference Only)
Grading Rubric for Short Assignment
|
Understanding and Knowledge / Use of sources |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
|
Good |
- The answer can clearly and accurately explain/interpret the concept(s)/notion(s) indicated in the question |
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfactory |
- The answer can slightly explain/interpret the notion the concept(s)/notion(s) indicated in the question - Minor inaccuracies occur OR - Can only clearly explain/interpret either one or two (not all) the concept(s)/notion(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Pass |
- Can only slightly explain/interpret either one or two (not all) the concept(s)/notion(s) indicated in the question - Inaccuracies occur OR - Provided an answer, but the answer is very simple without any detailed interpretation or explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
Fail |
- Inaccuracies and a lack of clarity occur in the answer. - No attempt to answer the question |
|
|
|
|
|
Quality of Argument |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
|
Good |
- All of the author’s views arepresented clearly and unambiguously - Every argument given and/or discussed in the paper is clearly stated with a cogent logical structure - The answer is supported with relevant illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfactory |
- There are some minor or inconsequential errors with respect to the accuracy and/or clarity of the views discussed - Illustrations are provided in the answer but are slightly related to concept(s)/notion(s) indicated in the question |
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Pass |
- There are noticeable errors in the accuracy and clarity of the views discussed - Some illustrations/arguments might not be clearly stated, are noticeably unclear, or have no clear structure |
|
|
|
|
|
Fail |
- Inaccuracies and a lack of clarity occur in the answer - No relevant illustrations are offered - No attempt to answer the question |
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation, Structure and Organization, and Clarity |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
|
|
Good |
- There are very few (if any) errors with respect to grammar, mechanics, words choice, spelling, etc - The answer is easy to follow and written in a clear style |
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfactory |
- There are minor errors of grammar, mechanics, and usage in the answer, or a single instance of a more substantial one. Such errors have little effect on the overall clarity and coherence of the answer - The answer is fairly easy to follow |
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Pass |
- There are noticeably many errors of grammar, mechanics, and usage, or a moderate number of more substantial errors - The writing style and tone has a negative effect on the answer |
|
|
|
|
|
Fail |
- The paper’s grammar and mechanics is barely above the minimum acceptable standard - No attempt to answer the question |
|
|
|
|
LSE 7140 Law, Liberty & Morality
2023- 2024
Instruction: Answer All Questions (25% each; Total is 100%). Your answers for the whole short assignment should not exceed 1200 words in total.
Please indicate clearly the question number for your answers in your Short Assignment.
Case:
Ataman and Subramanian, “French court confirms ban on ‘burkinis ’in city’s swimming pools,” CNN, 21 June 2022, available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/06/21/europe/grenoble-france-burkini-ban-pools-upheld-intl/index.html
Based on the above news report on the “burkinis” debate, answer the following questions:
1. Compare the situation of the burkinis case with the situation of the debate on the France's 2004 “Headscarf Law.” Discuss their significant similarities and differences which may be relevant to the (limitation of) freedom of religion as specified in ICCPR Article 18.
2. Based on the two concepts of liberty, discuss how the advocates of the French government would develop their argument for the ban on burkinis. Your answer should include the arguments defending the France's 2004 “Headscarf Law” and the discussions on ICCPR Article 18 and HRC (UN Human Rights Committee) General Comment 22 as well.
3. Based on the two concepts of liberty, discuss how the opponents of the French government would develop their argument against the ban on burkinis. Your answer should include the arguments challenging the France's 2004 “Headscarf Law” and the discussions on ICCPR Article 18 and HRC (UN Human Rights Committee) General Comment 22 as well.
4. If the burkinis case is also brought to the ECtHR, do you think the decision will be different from HRC? Why or why not?
