Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

ACCT3002 Advanced Management Accounting

Module 5: Managing multinational operations – transfer pricing

Case study

Transfer pricing

Sunshop Books is a multi-divisional book company that listed on the stock exchange about three years ago. Like many in the industry, Sunshop started out in the 1980s as a single-site suburban bookstore. Company CEO Lewis Negus has been in the role for three years, having joined the company around the time of its stock exchange listing. It was expected that the listing would provide much needed capital to enable the company to compete in what was becoming a rapidly changing and dynamic environment due to:

• continual merger and acquisition activity

• developments in technology such as e-readers and e-books as well as in the development of digital applications

• the financial difficulties experienced by industry participants particularly in the retail sector.

The company is currently structured around three main divisions as follows.

• Publishing: This division publishes educational textbooks, adult fiction and non-fiction books, and children’s books. Sunshop has a strong reputation for producing educational texts for the school and university markets.

• Retail: This division grew out of the original shop. Sunshop owns a number of specialist bookshops itself with a focus on developing close links with customers. Of course, the retail shops also served as an outlet for many of the books published by the Publishing division. As well as owning its own shops, Sunshop had also taken an ownership stake in a number of specialist retail bookstore chains.

• Technologies-based division: This division focuses on technological applications and works closely with the Publishing division in particular. This includes developing technological content to support the hardcopy textbooks produced by the Publishing division. For example, a recent project included the development of smart-card technology containing interactive software that enables students to self-test on content in the specific chapters of an auditing text.

Each divisional manager is evaluated on the basis of return on investment along with a mix of other measures. Bonuses are paid on the basis of ROI performance alone.

Transfer pricing issues

While senior management valued divisional manager autonomy and decision making, they felt the organisational interests should normally prevail. To this end, the key components of the company’s transfer pricing policy were:

• all transfers would occur at full costs plus a mark-up of 10 per cent

• there would be no sourcing autonomy; transacting internally would be the first priority

• divisions would be permitted to use any spare capacity to meet external demand.

The manager of the Technologies-based division — Carly Taylor — has raised concerns about the policy. Carly is proud of the innovation and creativity with the technological developments the division has been able to generate, particularly in the last two years. This has resulted in an increase in demand for their services from external customers including other book publishers and educational institutions. Carly argues that her divisional ROI would be higher if she had more autonomy to service outside customers. She says ‘full costs plus 10 per cent just does not give us enough of a return . . . we could be earning twice the profit on outside work’.

Required

(a) Evaluate the current transfer pricing system (including consideration of the strengths and limitations).

(b) What changes would you make to help address the limitations you identified? How would these changes be an improvement on the current system?

(a)

Strengths include:

· Divisions are investment centres (evaluated on the basis of ROI). The TP policy includes a mark-up on full costs providing at least some profit component

· With no sourcing autonomy internal work is prioritized.

· Policy allows any spare capacity to be used for additional outside work.

Weaknesses include:

· Main issues seems to be the lack of sourcing autonomy. Particularly for divisions such as the Technology-based division, which has an increasing demand for outside (more profitable work).

· The use of full cost plus a mark-up of only 10% may also be restricting divisional profitability (although at the same time may be helping to keep prices down).

(b) Responses here can vary but might include:

· Allowing sourcing autonomy.

· Change TP method to market-based transfer pricing.

· Consider structure (should all current divisions/work units be investment centres?).