High Distinction (80+)

Distinction (70+)

Credit (60+)

Pass (50+)

Needs Improvement (<50)

Identification and                  explanation of a key element of High Performing Teams   impacting adversely on         student performance (15%)

Relevant element is      clearly identified and   described fully with     example from the LiLo course.

Relevant element is    clearly identified with example but lacks full description.

Relevant element is       identified and described very briefly in general   terms. Appropriate        example is brief or not  included.

Relevant element is     difficult to grasp and   understand. Example   may be provided but   difficult to understand.

Relevant element is not      described and demonstrates lack of critical engagement with the LiLo module.

Critical and reflective          evaluation of how the           chosen element impacts the student with reference to     example drawn from prior  or current teamwork (30%)

Element analysis is      critical, logical and      workable. Good           example from               teamwork is included   and demonstrated with data (eg: quote from     another team member).

Element analysis is         critical, logical and         workable. Example from teamwork is included     but not thoroughly          discussed with data.

Element analysis is         limited in terms of a       critical evaluation but     shows a practical            approach. Example from the teamwork is general and not supported.

Element analysis is       deficient in relation to  critical thinking and     demonstrates limited    engagement with LiLO module. No example or irrelevant example or   no support provided.

Element analysis does not demonstrate critical          evaluation of deficient      element related to High    Performance teams.

Critical and reflective     action plan outlined to    improve teamwork by    showing how this impact will be managed (40%)

Action plan is well    designed, critical and logical and has          potential to result in  high performance if  implemented.

Action plan is logically   designed but lacks           thorough critical              reflection hindering the   potential to result in high performance if                implemented.

Action plan is limited in critical reflection and     design and has limited   potential to lead to high performance.

Action plan is deficient and limited and is         unlikely to result in      high performance.

Action plan is unrelated to element identified as         problematic and will not   result in high performance or any improvement.

Language and Layout

(15%)

Professional quality.     Error free, sophisticated use of vocabulary, and  well-developed concise sentences and                paragraphs.

Consistent formatting

Document contains very few errors. E.g. some     colloquial vocabulary,   minor organisational      issues that do not           interfere with                 communication.             Consistent formatting.

Document contains very few errors. E.g. some     colloquial vocabulary,   minor organisational      issues that do not           interfere with                 communication.

Minor layout problems.

Document contains       some errors. E.g. some  colloquialisms,              somewhat disorganised, some poor grammar.     At least one serious       layout problems (e.g.    no title).

Document contains many errors. E.g. some              colloquialisms,                disorganised, poor           grammar.

Multiple serious layout problems.