Department of Economics (STG), ECO200 2025-2026
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
Department of Economics (STG), ECO200 2025-2026
Writing-Assignment-Project-1
Evaluating Two Internal Proposals at Roger Waters, a Broadband Company
(5% of Overall Course Grade)
|
• Please submit this writing-assignment through Quercus “Project 1” assignment tab as a pdf file titled “LastName_FirstName_Last-5-Digits-Student-ID.pdf” by 11 pm, Thursday, October 23rd. This is NOT a group project — you must do this project on your own. • Penalty for late submissions: 50% of the entire Project 1 grade per 24 hours past the deadline. • Do NOT e-mail Project 1 to the course and/or course-staff e-mail accounts. If you have questions: please ask during the Instructor, Shadow Instructor, and the three TAs weekly office hours; if you experience technical issues, please take a screen shot and e-mail/visit IT support at the Robarts Library. • Under no circumstances, will the Project-1 weight be "shifted" to the "final-exam" weight; if a student’s registrar/accessibility services request a "substantial" extension, then the student will be assigned another writing- assignment. • Students will be required to submit their writing assignments (ex:projects) to Turnitin (via the Quercus course portal)for a review oftextual similarity and detection ofpossible plagiarism. In making a submission, students will allow their assignments to be included as source documents in the reference database. These will be used solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism. Ifyou have an objection to the use of Turnitinfor the submission ofyour work, please e-mail the instructor to book an appointment with at least two weeks prior to the submission deadline to discuss alternative arrangements. • Academic Code of Conduct: It is your responsibility to read and abide by the Student Academic Code of Conduct. Please note that any attempt to “collaborate”, “receive/provide help” to any other individual/organization is a serious violation of the academic code of conduct. • The Tutorial sessions on Wednesday October 15th will discuss ‘solving’ and ‘writing’ Project 1. You are expected to attend those TUTs: no “solutions” will be posted. We will not field queries about Project 1 outside of those TUTs and Office Hours and will not respond to e-mails queries about Project 1. |
“The Situation”
Rogers Watersis a Broadband service provider serving 60% of Ontario’s retail broadband customers. Rogers has hired you — a consultant at the BCG (Bad Consulting Group) — to advise them on the following two mutually exclusive internal proposals:
• Internal Proposal #1: Rogers’ Marketing team wants to increase the monthly retail price by $0.80. The Business-Analytics group has pointed out that raising the cost of broadband services will make Rogers’ customers “worse off ” and induce customers to switch/defect to “Bell”. The company wants you to analyze this proposal and recommend a strategy, if possible, whereby the company can raise prices and retain customers.
• Internal Proposal #2: Rogers’ Business-Analytics group wants to improve broadband services. The Marketing team has
pointed out that improving service will certainly make customers “better off ” but without the company “getting anything back in return” (after all, Rogers is a profit seeking company, not a charity). The company wants you to analyze this proposal and recommend a strategy, if possible, whereby the company can improve its service and make more money.
The CEO of Rogers has engaged you to investigate these two mutually exclusive proposals and write a business-report with your analysis and recommendations. The business-report must have a title page with your full name, student ID number, and — of course — the Bad Consulting Group logo. The report must at most three page (excluding the title page) and written in “simple, plain, direct” English free of “technical/micro/math/jargon” (that’s why you need to attend the TUT sessions on Wednesday, October 15th). The “format” (font, margin etc.) is up to you.
To reiterate: the title page plus max three pages report must not contain econ-jargon/math/formulas (of course, you can use graphs and tables). That said, you must show your “econ-analysis” in an appendix of (practically) unlimited length [no restrictions on math, econ-jargon, etc.]. The point of the appendix is to show the solution as you would on a test; the point of the paper is to explain your arguments and provide recommendations to someone who is well-read/intelligent/analytical (think of the Doctor in your family) but who has never taken an econ course (I mean, would you? That was a joke by the way). This project is 5% of your course grade; we will deduct 1% of your course grade if you use formulas, math, jargon (ex: MRS) in the main business-report.
You have already analyzed a similar problem as Project 1 in a TUT. To jolt your memory, recall the following utility model of the average broadband consumers’ preferences over cost and eight attributes of broadband service:
U = 一0.021C + 0.945FS + 1.009VFS + 0.417R + 0.134P + 0.092TH + 0.00001ML + 0.106VF + 0.069MR
Where:
|
C = Cost to Broadband Users |
|
FS = Fast speed internet service |
|
VFS = Very fast speed internet service |
|
R = Reliable internet service |
|
P = Priority of download service |
|
TH = Tele-health connectivity |
|
ML = Mobile laptop connectivity |
|
VF = Video phone capabilities |
|
MR = movie rentals |
2025-10-17