Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

Coursework Specification: COM 2206 Media Ethics

1) Individual Assignment: Media Ethics Case Study (20%)

Assignment Title: Ethical Evaluation of a Media Event

Example:

1) Coverage of the Israel-Palestine Conflict (Bias and Fairness)

2) Disinformation and Fake News During COVID-19 Pandemic (Truth and Deception)

3. Celebrity Privacy Violation by Paparazzi (Privacy and Exploitation)

Objective:
Analyze a recent media event by identifying ethical concerns and applying ethical theories to propose improvements for ethical media practices.

Instructions:

1. Select a Media Event: Choose a recent media event that involves ethical concerns in journalism, advertising, or social media (e.g., misinformation, bias, privacy invasion, sensationalism).

2. Analyze Ethical Concerns: Identify two ethical concerns present in the event (e.g., violation of truth, fairness, respect for privacy, bias, or public interest).

3. Apply Ethical Theories: Use Two Ethical Theories (e.g., Utilitarianism, Virtue Ethics, the Potter Box or Ethical Relativism) to analyze the ethical dilemmas faced by the media practitioners.

4. Propose Ethical Solutions: Based on your analysis, suggest ethically responsible actions that the media outlet or journalist could have taken. Your proposed solutions should be practical and align with ethical standards in the media.

5. Conclusion: Reflect on the broader implications of media ethics and how this analysis helps you understand the ethical responsibilities in professional communication.

Assignment Requirements:

· Word count: UNLIMITED words.

· Include references to relevant ethical guidelines (e.g., journalism ethics codes, advertising standards, or PR ethics).

· Use appropriate academic citation (APA Citation).

· Use Words

· Late submission and plagiarism including AI plagiarism NOT MORE-than 20%, if more it will deduct 30% from the mark.

Submission Deadline: WEEK 5

Rubric for Media Ethics Case Study

Criteria

Excellent (80-100%)

Good (60-79%)

Fair (40-59%)

Poor (0-39%)

Weight

Identification of Ethical Issues

Thorough identification of two relevant and significant ethical issues, with insightful analysis.

Clear identification of two ethical issues, with some analysis.

Identifies two ethical issues but lacks depth or relevance.

Fails to identify key ethical issues or address them superficially.

20%

Application of Ethical Theories

Excellent application of two ethical theories to the analysis, with strong connections to the media event.

Good application of ethical theories, with reasonable connections to the event.

Limited or partial application of ethical theories to the media event.

Inaccurate or minimal application of ethical theories, or theories are irrelevant.

30%

Critical Analysis of Ethical Dilemmas

Demonstrates exceptional critical thinking and insight in analyzing the dilemmas faced by the media.

Provides solid critical analysis with relevant points on the ethical dilemmas.

Analysis is basic, lacking depth or critical insight.

Little to no critical analysis; fails to address ethical dilemmas meaningfully.

30%

Proposed Ethical Solutions

Innovative and practical ethical solutions that are well-justified and aligned with media ethics.

Provides reasonable and practical ethical solutions with some justification.

Ethical solutions are vague, impractical, or lack clear justification.

No ethical solutions provided, or solutions are irrelevant and unfeasible.

10%

Clarity and Organization

Exceptionally clear, well-structured, and free of errors. Excellent flow and presentation.

Clear and organized with minor errors in structure or presentation.

Somewhat clear but disorganized with noticeable errors.

Disorganized, unclear, and riddled with errors.

10%

Total: 100%

2) Group Project: Write A Book (30%)

· First choose the topic, first get the topic.

· Different groups must have a different topic.

List of the TOPICS:

1. Ethics Behind the Algorithm: How Platforms Decide What You See

Unpacking ethical issues in recommendation engines and echo chambers.

2. When the News Becomes Entertainment: The Ethics of Infotainment

Discusses blurred lines between information, entertainment, and public duty.

3. Digital Blackout: Ethics of Censorship and Free Expression Online

Explores global media control, government pressure, and tech regulation.

4. Reporting Tragedy: Ethical Dilemmas in Victim-Centered Journalism

Focuses on consent, trauma sensitivity, and narrative responsibility.

5. Ethics in Citizen Journalism: Empowerment or Chaos?

Evaluates the role of non-professionals in shaping narratives without accountability.

Submission Requirements:

· Written A Book: un-limited words, with proper academic citations. Using Words. Range 100-120 pages NOT including reference.

· Each group can have NOT MORE than 10 people.

· Late submission and plagiarism including AI plagiarism NOT more-than 20%, if more it will deduct 30% from the mark

· Citations: Proper APA citations must be included for all external sources, theories, and case studies used throughout the book. For each chapter must have 15 citations.

· Submission Deadline – WEEK 10

Rubric for Group/Book Project: Ethical Media Practices

Criteria

Excellent (80-100%)

Good (60-79%)

Fair (40-59%)

Poor (0-39%)

Weight

Identification of Ethical Issues

Thorough and insightful identification of two or more major ethical concerns, with strong contextual analysis.

Clear identification of ethical issues, with reasonable analysis and relevant examples.

Identifies key ethical issues but lacks depth or relevance in analysis.

Fails to identify ethical issues clearly or address them superficially.

20%

Application of Ethical Theories

Excellent application of multiple ethical theories (e.g., Utilitarianism, Virtue Ethics, Potter Box), with clear connections to the case study or topic.

Good application of two or more ethical theories with reasonable connections to the media case.

Limited or partial application of ethical theories, with weak connections to the media case.

Inaccurate or minimal application of ethical theories, or theories are irrelevant.

30%

Critical Analysis of Ethical Dilemmas

Demonstrates exceptional critical thinking and insight into the ethical dilemmas. All angles and potential consequences are considered in detail.

Provides solid analysis of the ethical dilemmas with relevant points, though some may be underdeveloped.

Basic analysis, lacking depth or critical insight. Few or no consequences are considered.

Little to no critical analysis; ethical dilemmas are either not addressed or treated superficially.

25%

Proposed Ethical Solutions

Innovative, practical, and well-justified ethical solutions that align with media ethics standards and are grounded in analysis.

Provides reasonable ethical solutions that are practical, with some justification and alignment with media ethics standards.

Ethical solutions are vague, impractical, or lack clear justification.

No ethical solutions provided, or solutions are irrelevant and unfeasible.

15%

Clarity and Organization

Exceptionally clear, well-structured, and free of errors. Excellent flow and logical progression between chapters or sections.

Clear and organized with minor errors. Adequate flow and structure, but some sections may need more clarity.

Somewhat clear but disorganized, with noticeable errors or lack of coherence.

Disorganized, unclear, and riddled with errors. Lacks coherence or logical structure.

10%

Presentation (if applicable)

Engaging, clear, and well-organized presentation with effective visual aids (if a presentation is part of the book project).

Clear and organized presentation with good use of visuals. Some sections may need more refinement.

Somewhat clear presentation but lacks engagement or effective visual aids.

Disorganized, unclear presentation with poor or no use of visuals.

10%

Total: 100%