Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

Faculty of Business and Law

Assignment Brief

Module Title

Globalisation and International HRM

Assignment Number

1

Module Code

HRMG 3203

Assignment Title

Individual Narrated Power Point

Module Leader

Dr Amarachi Amaugo

Assignment Weighting

40%

Assignment Release Date:

1st October, 2023

Submission Date/Time:

February 9th, 11:59am 2024 (Online Submission)

Assessment Information – What you need to do

This assignment is an individual assignment.

This assignment requires you to do 10 minutes narrated PPT with notes to support slides:500 words (+/-10%) (This can be put on the note section of your slides).

Slides and notes should be referenced

You should have at most 12 slides altogether.

Criteria for Assessment - How you will be marked

Please see below the criteria by which your work will be assessed.

Narrated PPT Presentation Assessment Criteria:

Criteria

Comments

Marks

Content

a. Depth of analysis, interpretation &

discussion.

b. Application of HRM principles

60%

- Highlight of key concepts

- Analytical approach to answering

the questions

- Appropriate use of theory

and application of concepts and

appropriate theory

- Clarity of argument,

explanation and interpretation

- Summary of key issues

- Originality

Evidence

Depth of research undertaken

25%

- Supporting evidence on the presentation slides

- Wider reading

- Depth of research under-

taken (eg. Statistical data)

- Use of relevant examples

- Problem solving

Presentation Style

15%

- Fluency

- Enthusiasm

- Logical structure

(introduction, analysis, conclusion)

- Logical sequence of information

- Appropriate use of A/V

- Time keeping

Total Mark

Further information on University mark descriptors can be found here.

This assignment is designed to assess the following learning outcomes:

1) A critical understanding of 'Globalisation' as an approach and an ideology, particular in relation to national contexts and labour.

2) To analyse and evaluate how national institutional and cultural differences shape employment practices and to engage critically with the debates surrounding National Business Systems and HRM.

3) Ability to construct a critical analysis of the role of MNCs.

4) Understand and examine the concept of IHRM and the processes involved in constructing IHRM strategies and practices with implications for ethical issues.

Assessment Details

This is a narrated power point assessment.

The length of recording is 10 minutes long.

Please record this as a using DMU Replay (Follow this link - Globalisation and International HRM - HRMG3203_2023_520 [assignments]) and copy the link and paste this on the submission link on cover page of your slide deck before uploading LZ.

Please watch the course work support 1 recording on this to help guide you.

There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark for work exceeding the number of slides and time specified.

Include in text citations and references list at the end.

Individual Narrated Power point

Please pick either 1 or 2 and prepare a narrated PPT on anyone of them.

1. You will prepare a narrated PPT presentation in which you will critically discuss some of the cultural implications arising from the role, behaviour and cross–border activities of multinational corporations (MNCs).

Or

2. You will prepare a narrated PPT presentation on an employment system of a particular country (Please USA and Germany should not be used for this assessment as this will be covered in the lecture as an example). You will present your analysis and main findings of the key features and issues of this employment system

Guidelines for Assessment 1 – Narrated PPT Presentation (40%)

· Each student will prepare a narrated PPT presentation of the analysis, main findings and recommendations of the case study AND by answering the questions given.

· You should pay close attention to the marking scheme AND assessment criteria given below when preparing your narrated PPT presentations.

· Each person should prepare 10 minutes narrated PPT and record on DMU Replay. Thus, prior preparation is vital. Don’t leave everything to the last minute!!!!

· Upon completion of your recording, you will receive an email with your recording link. Kindly copy this link and paste on the submission link on LZ

· 10 minutes narrated PPT presentation. Time allocation must be given toward setting agenda of presentation, presenting findings related to the analysis and recommendations of the case study, and summary of overall session.

· Maximum of 12 presentation slides to be used.

· Don’t forget to include notes to support slides:500 words (+/-10%) (This can be put on the

note section of your slides). Slides and notes should be referenced

· Please upload the slides as well (Instruction would be provided to you nearer the time).

Links to help

· Your Virtual Learning Environment - Submitting your video in DMU Replay

How to Submit your Assessment

The assessment must be submitted by 12:00 noon (GMT/BST) on February 9th, 11:59am 2024 (Online Submission). No paper copies are required. You can access the submission link through the module web under the assessment folder on BB.

· Your coursework will be given a zero mark if you do not submit a copy through Turnitin. Please take care to ensure that you have fully submitted your work.

· Please ensure that you have submitted your work using the correct file format, unreadable files will receive a mark of zero. The Faculty accepts Microsoft Office and PDF documents, unless otherwise advised by the module leader.

· All work submitted after the submission deadline without a valid and approved reason will be subject to the University regulations on late submissions.

o If an assessment is submitted up to 24 hours late the mark for the work will be capped at the pass mark of 40 per cent for undergraduate modules or 50 per cent for postgraduate modules

o If an assessment is submitted beyond 24 hours late the work will receive a mark of zero per cent

o The above applies to a student’s first attempt at the assessment. If work submitted as a reassessment of a previously failed assessment task is submitted later than the deadline the work will immediately be given a mark of zero per cent

o If an assessment which is marked as pass/fail rather than given a percentage mark is submitted later than the deadline, the work will immediately be marked as a fail

· The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you can’t submit your coursework by the deadline – these events should be beyond your control and not easy to predict.  If this happens, you can apply for an extension to your deadline for up to five working days, or if you need longer, you can apply for a deferral, which takes you to the next assessment period (for example, to the re-sit period following the main Assessment Boards). You must apply before the deadline for your assessment. You will find information about applying for extensions and deferrals here.

· Students MUST keep a copy and/or an electronic file of their assignment.

· Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites.

Return of Marked Work

You can expect to have feedback returned to you on (15 working days). If for any reason there is a delay you will be kept informed. Marks and feedback will be provided online. It is important that you access the feedback you receive as this will help to make improvements to your later work, you can request a meeting with your Module Leader or Personal Tutor to discuss your feedback in more detail.

Marks will have been internally moderated only, and will therefore be provisional; your mark will be formally agreed later in the year once the external examiner has completed their review. More information on assessment and feedback can be found here.

Academic Integrity and Generative AI Use

In submitting a piece of work for assessment it is essential that you understand the University's requirements for maintaining academic integrity and ensure that the work does not contravene University regulations. Some examples of behaviour that would not be considered acceptable include plagiarism, re-use of previously assessed work, collusion with others and purchasing your assignment from a third party. For more information on academic offences, bad academic practice, and academic penalties, please read chapter four of our academic regulations.

Module leaders are allowed to decide what approach they wish to take on Generative AI use.  Choose one of the two statements in bold below.  Delete the statement that does not apply.  If you opt for selective use, you will need to specify what can be used and how it may be used.

Generative AI tools cannot be used for this assessment. You must not use generative artificial intelligence (AI) to generate any materials or content in relation to your assessment.

Generative AI tools may be used selectively for this assessment. Module Leaders will need to define in what ways they want students to use AI tools and how they wish them to use them.

Any use of generative AI needs to be appropriately acknowledged. Students should add a statement explaining which technologies were used, how they were used and how this output was then used to complete the assignment. Direct use of outputs should be cited.

Examples of a student acknowledgement statement are shown below:

Statement of acknowledgment 1 - generative AI used when module leader allows it.

I have used (list all AI system (s) used and links e.g., Google’s Bard, https://bard.google.com) to (provide details of how you have used generative artificial intelligence e.g., to breakdown some of the concepts taught on the module). The prompt (s) I have used are (include the prompt (s) e.g., you are an enthusiastic tutor who is also an experienced economist, help me understand the concept of game theory with explanations and examples). What was generated from these prompts was used to (explain how they were used in your submission, e.g., develop a section on game theory exemplars).

Statement of acknowledgment 2 – generative AI not used when module leader allows it.

This assessment has not used any generative-AI.

You can find the library guide on generative AI use here - https://library.dmu.ac.uk/genai

Academic Support and Your Well-being

Referencing is the process of acknowledging other people’s work when you have used it in your assignment or research. It allows the reader to locate your source material as quickly and easily as possible so that they can read these sources themselves and verify the validity of your arguments. Referencing provides the link between what you write and the evidence on which it is based.

You identify the sources that you have used by citing them in the text of your assignment (called citations or in-text citations) and referencing them at the end of your assignment (called the reference list or end-text citations). The reference list only includes the sources cited in your text. The main referencing guide can be found here and includes information on the basics of referencing and achieving good academic practice. It also has tabs for the specific referencing styles depending on whether you require Harvard style used in business or OSCOLA style used by the Law school.

The University has a wealth of support services available to students; further information can be obtained from Student Gateway, the Student Advice Centre, Library and Learning Services and, most importantly, your Personal Tutor. If you are struggling with your assessments and/or deadlines please do seek help as soon as possible so that appropriate support and guidance can be identified and put in place for you. More information can be found on the Healthy DMU pages.