闪电代写 -代写CS作业_CS代写_Finance代写_Economic代写_Statistics代写_代码代做_IT代写_加急帮助

Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

COMP637 Business Analysis Project - Assignment 3

Assignment 3

2 Reports

REPORT 1

You work for the Business Analysis Organisation “BAOrg”. BAOrg has been commissioned by Riccarton Repairs to produce a Requirements Document and perform an Initial Market Scan, that will eventually be used to develop a business case for the company to purchase or develop an Automotive Workshop Management System. As you know from your previous assignments, the current processes are disjointed, manual, and paper based.

You have been tasked a write a Report for BAOrg. Your Report will comprise of 3 sections.

1. Section 1 of the Report - Requirements Document on Functionality: You have been tasked by BAOrg to write a Requirements Document, which will require you to examine the transcripts provided in Assignments 1 and 2 (we have provided these again and attach them in this Assignment 3).

The Requirements Document must include the following sections:

a. Identify “ten main functional requirements of the system”. These need to be presented as a list of bullets points, and each bullet needs to include a few sentences explaining the functional requirement at a very high level.

b. Identify “three non-functional requirements of the system” that need to be considered as part of the solution. Again, you need only list these requirements as bullets points with a few sentences for each explaining the non-functional requirement at a very high level.

2. Section 2 of the Report - Initial Market Scan: You have also been tasked by BAOrg to perform a high-level Initial Market Scan as part of your report.

Your Initial Market Scan must include the following:

a. Identify and list (bullet points is fine) three (3) existing Automotive Workshop Management Systems that are currently available on the market to either purchase or subscribe to, that could be a possible viable solution for Riccarton Repairs.

b. Write a summary description for each system that includes:

i. An overview of the proposed system and how it works;

ii. How the system will meet at least three (3) functional requirements and one (1) non-functional requirement you have identified in Section 1; and

iii. Identify at least two (2) areas of the system that might need further review to determine the system’s suitability for Riccarton Repairs.

3. Section 3 of the Report - Conclusion: Conclude the report with a brief overview of:

a. Your recommended system and why you are recommending the proposed system;

b. Whether your recommended system can meet the majority of the functional requirements and non-functional requirements identified in Section 1 (i.e., the recommended system meets at least five (5) functional requirements and one (1) non-functional requirement); and

c. consider at least one (1) functional or non-functional requirement’s that may require further review of your recommended system.

IMPORTANT REMINDER: DO NOT CONTACT ANY OF THE SOLUTION PROVIDERS

FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT. IF WE ARE NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE MADE CONTACT

WITH A SOLUTION PROVIDER OR IF YOU ARE CAUGHT DOING SO, THEN YOU WILL FAIL THIS ASSIGNMENT. USE ONLY WHAT IS AVAILABLE TO YOU IN THE PUBLIC

DOMAIN, I.E., THE SOLUTION PROVIDER’S WEBSITE

All referencing must use the APA 7th edition style

(https://ltl.lincoln.ac.nz/assets/Uploads/Learning-and-Research-

Skills/Referencing/APA_7th_in_Depth.pdf)

Your REPORT should be formatted in a professional manner that uses appropriate headings and structure. Your report should include a cover page, contents page, page numbers, and appropriate headings and formatting.

The report must not exceed 800 words excluding cover page, contents page, and references. A minimum of 300 words is required.

Reports must use font size 11 in either Calibri or Arial font, with single line spacing.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

REPORT 1 (70/200 marks)

Submission

You must submit two separate PDF documents, one for each report.

Submit your reports via the Assessment page on the Learn@Lincoln COMP 637 page.

Ensure that you include your Name and Student ID on the cover page and in the footer of each document.

Due 5pm NEW ZEALAND TIME, Monday 12th February 2024

REPORT 2

Riccarton Repairs sees the Automotive Workshop Management System’ project as the start of a wider digital transformation and as part of this wider project it has asked BAOrg to undertake work on an Internal and External Analysis based on the engagement with the organisation to date.

You have been tasked a write a Report for Riccarton Repairs. Your Report will comprise of 3 sections.

1. Section 1 - External Analysis: Use the PESTLE approach to conduct an External Analysis of the New Zealand environment for automotive workshops. In this analysis choose four (4) of the PESTLE areas to focus your report on.

2. Section 2 - Internal Analysis: Using the POPIT model, with a separate heading for each of the four (4) POPIT areas, discuss the following within each of the headings:

a. Discuss the potential for change in that area;

b. Provide a short Gap Analysis highlighting the current state and the desired future state;

c. Identify potential solutions to bridge the gap(s) identified.

3. Section 3 - Future Considerations: Your report should identify any areas that are a

priority for investment to ensure that the digital transformation programme succeeds.

Your report should also highlight further analysis, investigation or information required to provide more information.

IMPORTANT REMINDER: DO NOT CONTACT ANY AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESSES OR

WORKSHOPS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT. IF WE ARE NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE MADE CONTACT WITH AN AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESSES OR WORKSHOP OR IF YOU ARE

CAUGHT DOING SO, THEN YOU WILL FAIL THIS ASSIGNMENT. USE ONLY WHAT IS AVAILABLE TO YOU IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, I.E., THE AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS’S OR WORKSHOP’S WEBSITE

All referencing must use the APA 7th edition style

(https://ltl.lincoln.ac.nz/assets/Uploads/Learning-and-Research-

Skills/Referencing/APA_7th_in_Depth.pdf)

This report must be between 5-8 pages excluding cover page, contents page, and references.

Reports must use font size 11 in either Calibri or Arial font, with single line spacing.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

REPORT 2 (130/200 Marks)

Item

Marking

Range

Assessment Criteria

Report

Presentation

and Layout

0 to 12

marks

(total

weighting for this section is 12/130)

Report is formatted in a professional manner consistent with instructions.

Has minimal to no grammatical errors, is presented clearly and in a succinct manner.

Neatly presented in a clear and logical manner clear. Keeps to the word count.

Uses APA referencing.

PESTLE

Analysis

(External

Analysis)

0 to 48

marks

12 marks for each area of PESTLE.

(total

weighting for this section 48/130)

Uses the PESTLE approach to conduct an External Analysis of the New Zealand environment for the

automotive workshops.

Provides clear analysis over four (4) areas of PESTLE by explaining each area in a succinct manner.

Demonstrates an ability to undertake research in order to establish a high-level of understanding of environment in which Riccarton Repairs operates (i.e., New Zealand

Automotive environment)

Demonstrates understanding of the PESTLE approach by applying each of the four (4) areas to Riccarton

Repairs situation.

Provides critical analysis and evaluation over the

application of the four (4) areas to Riccarton Repairs.

Laid out neatly in a logical flow, is presented well , has

good readability, and demonstrates clear understanding of the PESTLE approach.

POPIT

MODEL

(Internal

Analysis)

0 to 48

marks

(12 marks for each area of POPIT.

(Total

weighting for this section 48/130)

Uses the POPIT approach to conduct an Internal

Analysis of Riccarton Repairs’ business with respect to the digital upgrade project.

Provides clear analysis using the four (4) areas of POPIT by explaining each area in a succinct manner.

Demonstrates an ability to undertake and apply research in order to establish a high-level of understanding of

internal factors that may be applicable to Riccarton Repairs.

Demonstrates understanding of the POPIT Model approach by applying each of the four (4) areas to Riccarton Repairs situation.

Applies each of the four (4) areas to Riccarton Repairs situation and provides a good overview of critical

analysis over the application of the four (4) areas to Riccarton Repairs.

Lists any gaps identified and provides explanation and

analysis towards potential ways of remediating the gaps.

Laid out neatly in a logical flow, is presented well and

demonstrates clear understanding of the POPIT model.

Future

Considerations

0 to 22

marks

(total

weighting for this section is 22/130)

Future considerations are clearly and logically drafted.

Provides a recommendation for Riccarton Repairs taking into account the findings and analysis presented in

sections 2 and 3 of the Report (PESTLE and POPIT approaches).

Explains why the proposed system has been

recommended for the New Zealand environment.

Identifies any areas that are a priority for investment to ensure that the digital transformation programme

succeeds for Riccarton Repairs.

Considers future analysis to be undertaken in the gaps

identified within the PESTLE and POPIT approaches by highlighting (at a high level) further analysis, investigation or information required to provide more information for