ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT 2023-2024 ACADEMIC YEAR
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
MSC LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
ASSIGNMENT
2023-2024 ACADEMIC YEAR
Introduction
In this Analytical Techniques for Supply Chain Management Assignment, you will be presented with two questions, each weighted at 45 marks. Questions are designed in a way that you get a chance to revisit the models and tools we have learned in class. While the supply chain context of the questions remains the same, each student has a dataset prepared for themselves to avoid high similarity rates on Turnitin. Please limit your submission to 1,000 – 3,000 words.
Please confirm that you downloaded the dataset titled your student number
(“S123456.xlsx”) before answering the questions.
Please use the discussion board for any questions you might have about this assignment.
We will answer all questions that are asked two days before the submission deadline to minimise last-minute stress and encourage timely attention to the assignment.
It has been a great pleasure to teach you these subjects. We hope you enjoy this assignment and use the techniques in the future.
Prof Dr Emel Aktas
November 2023
Disclaimer: Although the problems presented in this assignment are informed by real events, the names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are the products of the author’s imagination. Any resemblance to actual persons, actual businesses, or actual events is coincidental.
1 Inferential Statistics [45 marks]
The sheet titled “ Inference.xlsx” includes the delivery data captured by a major online grocery retailer through their loyalty programme as well as the results of a home delivery satisfaction survey using a sample of online grocery orders in the first five days of January 2019. The dataset contains information about the following variables:
• Customer satisfaction score (A value between 1 and 6 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 6 being fully satisfied. The score is calculated based the average rating of multiple satisfaction questions.)
• Delivery tracking (A variable consisting of “available” where the delivery can be tracked and “Not available” where the delivery cannot be tracked)
• Number of Items in the basket (Number of items that were included in the order)
• % of perishable items in the basket ((Total value of perishable items that were included in the order/Total value of the order) x 100)
• Customer’s sensitivity to delivery cost (A value between 0 and 5 with 0 being not at all sensitive and 5 being highly sensitive)
• Customer engagement score (The sum of the number of clicks on different delivery service functions between the order and the delivery time)
• Number of previous online orders (Over the last year)
• The time between order and delivery of the last order (in hours)
• The delivery delay of more than 24 hours (A variable consisting of “no” and “yes”)
The director of supply chain is preparing a report for the board and has asked you to analyse the data and derive insights and conclusions.
a. Build an appropriate inferential statistics model to explain the variability in customer satisfaction scores.
b. Interpret the results you obtain from your inferential statistics model.
c. Check that the assumptions of your model hold as applicable.
d. How do you suggest improving your model?
2 Mathematical Modelling [45 marks]
The workload in many areas of publishing operations follows a non-uniform distribution with respect to time of day. For example, at Cranfield Design and Print Studio in Cranfield University, the number of print requests put in by customers, if plotted against the time of day, would appear to have the shape of an inverted and skewed U curve, with the peak around 3 pm For efficient use of resources, the personnel available should vary over the day. Figure 1shows an atypical workload curve and corresponding personnel requirements at different times of the day.
Figure 1 Print room workload requirement overtime
The variable capacity of an operation can be achieved effectively by employing part-time personnel. Part-timers are paid less per hour than full-time employees. Other considerations, however, may limit the extent to which part-time workers can be hired in a given part of the Design and Print Studio. The problem is to find an optimum workforce schedule that would meet personnel requirements at any given time whilst being economical. Some of the factors affecting personnel assignment are listed here:
• Full-time employees work for 8 hours per day plus a 1-hour break for lunch.
• Approximately half of the full-timers go to lunch between 12 pm and 13 pm, and the remaining go between 13 pm to 14 pm.
• Part-timers work for at least 3 continuous hours but no more than 5 continuous hours per day and are not allowed a lunch break.
• By corporate policy, part-time personnel hours are limited to a maximum of 40% of the day’s total requirement. For example, if the total personnel hours required over a day is 100 hours, then at most 40 hours of this could be met by part-time personnel. This is a policy generally applied to ensure high ownership of the service business.
• The shift starts at 9 am and ends at 7 pm (i.e., overtime is limited to 1 hour). Any work left over at 7 pm is considered a backorder for the next day.
• A full-time employee is allowed one hour of overtime per day. He or she is paid 1.5 times the normal rate typically applicable to overtime hours.
The personnel hours required, by hour of the day, are given in the spreadsheet titled “Workforce” along with the average rate per full-time personnel hour and the average rate per part-time personnel hour.
The Cranfield Design and Print Studio’s goal is to achieve the minimum possible personnel cost subject to meeting or exceeding the hourly workforce requirements as well as the constraints on the workers listed above.
a. Define the objective function, decision variables and constraints for the minimum-cost schedule for the Cranfield Design and Print Studio.
b. Provide the solution with values of the decision variables and the objective function.
c. Present your results in your report to a non-technical audience, clearly indicating how many part-time and full-time staff are needed throughout the day and how much this schedule would cost Cranfield Design and Print Studio.
d. What are some of the limitations of your approach? Why?
3 Style and Presentation [10 marks]
You will receive marks for the style and presentation of your assignment. Please pay attention to
a. Writing grammatically correctly and concisely.
b. Providing captions for your tables and figures and citing them in the text.
c. Using an appropriate level of precision.
d. Presenting your assignment in a clear report structure.
Marking Criteria
Marks will be awarded for the level of understanding demonstrated in the concepts and accuracy of your answers. In addition, marks can also be gained for discussions you raise - so long as they can be supported. This is a practical assignment. The ‘acid test’ is whether your report could be successfully implemented based on the concepts that you employ and the supporting discussion that you provide.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
Excellent (80-100%) |
Very good (70-79%) |
Good (60-69%) |
Satisfactory (50-59%) |
Poor (40-49%) |
Very poor (0-39%) |
|
Inferential Statistics |
Inferential statistical model and the interpretations are accurate; the assumptions are fully checked and interpreted. |
Inferential statistical model and the interpretations are mostly accurate; most assumptions are checked and interpreted. |
Inferential statistical model is somewhat accurate; some assumptions are checked and interpreted. |
Inferential statistical model is questionable, and the assumptions are not checked or not interpreted. |
Inferential statistical model is inaccurate. |
Inferential statistical model is not conducted. |
|
Linear Programming |
Decision variables, objective function, and constraints are defined accurately. Interpretations are provided in great detail and referenced. |
Decision variables, objective function, and constraints are defined mostly accurately. Interpretations are provided in great detail. |
Decision variables, objective function, and constraints are defined somewhat accurately. Interpretations are provided in sufficient detail. |
Decision variables, objective function, and constraints are questionable. Interpretations are provided in some detail. |
Decision variables, objective function, and constraints are defined inaccurately. Interpretations are provided in insufficient detail. |
Decision variables, objective function, and constraints are not defined. Interpretations are not provided. |
|
Style and Presentation • Coherence and conciseness of writing, appropriate vocabulary |
Exceptionally fluent structure, and clarity of expression. Table and figure captions are meaningful. Tables and Figures cited in the text. No spillage on the page margins. |
Language fluent thoughts and ideas clearly expressed. Table and figure captions are |
Language mainly fluent, minor spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors. Table and figure captions are sometimes meaningful. Tables and Figures are sometimes cited in the text. |
Language understandable, meaning apparent but not explicit, grammar or spelling poor. Table and figure captions with minimal information. Tables and Figures are not always cited in the text and sometimes spilling over the margins. |
Language far from fluent but understandable, grammar or spelling poor. Table and figure captions missing or inconsistent. Tables and Figures cited wrongly in the text. |
Language far from fluent, meaning unclear, grammar or spelling poor. Table and figure captions are missing. Tables and Figures not cited in the text |
|
meaningful. and Figures consistently the text. |
Tables are cited in |
2023-12-11