Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

Strategic Decision Making and Games (ES50116)

Mid Term Coursework

Submission by 18 November 2022

Answer all questions

Q1.

Give an example of any economic or social or biological phenomenon where the notion of a mixed strategy equilibrium is useful for understanding the phenomenon.

Consider the following 2 player normal form game. Player 1’s strategy set is {T, B} and

Player 2’s strategy set is {L, M, R}. Payoffs are given in the boxes where the first element refers to player 1’s payoff.

L

M

R

T

7, 2

2, 7

3, 6

B

2, 7

7, 2

4, 5

Compute a Nash equilibrium for this game. [25]

Q2

Consider an industry with the following demand curve

P = 100 – 2Q, where Q is total output produced.

Two firms serve the market. Firm 1’s constant marginal cost of production is 20 and firm 2’s constant marginal cost of production is 30.

Firms compete by choosing quantities (Cournot competition). Find the equilibrium price and profits.     If the two firms were to collude, what would be the market price and profits? Can such collusion work? [25]

Q3.

Kaushik Basu formulated a simple game called “The Traveller’s Dilemma” in 1994. Consider a version of this game, following Rubinstein (2006).

There are two players. Each of the players chooses an amount between $180 and $300.

Both players are paid the lower of the two chosen amounts.

Five dollars are transferred from the player who chose the larger amount to the player who chose the smaller one.

In the case that both players choose the same amount, they both receive that amount and no transfer is made.

What is your choice?

Basu, K., Scientific American, June 2007, Pages: 90-95

Rubinstein, A. Econometrica, 2006, Pages 873-877

What does this dilemma show? Can you think of any other situation where similar dilemmas arise? How do you resolve this dilemma? [25]

Q4.

Consider the following 2 player normal form game. Player 1’s strategy set is {X, Y} and

player 2’s strategy set is {L, R}. Payoffs are given below, where the first element in each cell refers to player 1’s payoff. Find a Nash equilibrium (in pure strategies) for this game. Is this Nash equilibrium unique?

L

R

X

5,5

0, 6

Y

8, 2

1,1

Suppose player 1’s strategy set has been expanded to include Z. The expanded game is given below. Assuming players play their Nash equilibrium strategies, for what values of k and t, will player 1 be worse-off and player 2 be better-off in this expanded setting?

L

R

X

5,5

0, 6

Y

8,2

1, 1

Z

k, t

3, 5

[25]