Administrative Arrangements

This assignment contributes 100% of your overall mark for STAT6077.  The deadline is 4:00pm on Monday 8th January 2024 (Week 15).

Electronic Coursework Submission

You should submit coursework electronically via the TurnitinUK plagiarism device on Blackboard, by not later than the published date and time. Turnitin is a plagiarism detection tool which checks your work against electronic sources and other submissions for the same assignment.

Login to the Blackboard site for this module and select the Assignments link from the left-hand menu.  Find the coursework and click View/Complete. There will be a series of screens to complete and then you will upload your assessment as an electronic file.

For a tutorial explaining the submission procedure in detail please go to the iSolutions website: https://elearn.soton.ac.uk/article-categories/tii-student/ 

Once you have submitted your assignment through Turnitin, you are able to download a copy of your Digital Receipt. It is recommended you do this as soon as your submission is complete and keep a copy, since it may be required as proof that you have submitted your work. When your submission is successful, you are taken back to the Assignment Dashboard and a message is shown that says “Submission uploaded successfully Download digital receipt”. You can select “Download Digital Receipt” to download your receipt. If you come back to the dashboard in the future, the message will not be shown instead you can use the icon to the far right of the submission item to download a copy of your Digital Receipt.  If you do not receive a submission ID number and cannot download a Digital Receipt, it means that you have not submitted. If this is the case, you will be penalised. If you think you have submitted but cannot obtain a Digital Receipt, then you should contact the module coordinator as soon as possible.

You are advised to leave plenty of time before the deadline for electronic coursework submission. Delays due to computer ‘glitches’ will not be considered as justification for late submission.

Penalty for late submission

When coursework is set a due date for submission will be specified and there will be associated penalties for handing in work late unless a deadline extension has been formally granted.  Work submitted up to 5 days after the deadline will be marked as usual, including moderation or second marking, and feedback prepared and given to the student. The final agreed mark is then reduced by the factors in the following table.

University Working Days late	Mark
1	(final agreed mark) * 0.9
2	(final agreed mark) * 0.8
3	(final agreed mark) * 0.7
4	(final agreed mark) * 0.6
5	(final agreed mark) * 0.5
More than 5	Zero

For example, if your mark for the coursework is 63% but you hand in your work 3 working days late, then your final mark would be 63*0.7 = 44.1%.  

Troubleshooting and Academic Integrity

This is not group work. Your report must be your own work and based on your own analysis. You are not permitted to show any student your written work or computer code/syntax or outputs.  Copying includes using another student’s computer code/syntax, output or graphics.  Turnitin submissions will be examined, and if academic integrity is deemed to have been breached, there are a range of penalties that may be applied.  Your attention is also drawn to the section regarding academic integrity in the Module Outline.

Students for whom English is not their first language sometimes feel it is easier to write in their home language and then translate their work, sometimes using translation software. We encourage you to work in English throughout. We have some evidence that using translation software may lead to the translated text being identified as plagiarism, as the software reverts to common phrases. The University does not recommend or endorse companies offering proof-reading or translation services.

The Tasks

Answer the research questions outlined in Tasks 1 to 4.    Please also provide the complete Stata do-files for Tasks 1, 2 and 4 in the appendix of your assignment since they will be evaluated together with the results of the sub-questions in each task.  Please do this by copying the text from your do-file into the appendix of your assignment, rather than by attaching the do-file as a separate file.  Please provide Stata results relevant for answering the questions in the main text of your assignment.   

TASK 1: POVERTY AND INEQUALITY

In this task you will use data from the 2006/07 Family Resources Survey (FRS_data_0607.dta). The data contain observations from 55,778 individuals (adults and children) living in 24,199 households in the UK.  Note that, since weights are not included in the dataset, you do not need to use weights for this task.  The table below provides a list of variables.

Analysis of FRS data (Note: please provide your Stata do-file in the Appendix.)

Variable name	Description
sernum	Unique household identification number
indinc	Individual income gross
nindinc	Individual income net
age80	Age (all adults aged 80 over are coded as 80)
famsize	Number of individuals in household
empstati	ILO employment status variable

By analysing this dataset, answer the following questions:

a) How does the choice of gross or net household income influence our estimate of the percentage of the population that are ‘poor’? To answer this question, calculate the percentage poor for gross and net household income separately and then compare the results. For each income type, use three relative poverty lines: 40%, 50% and 60% of the median household income.                                            [14]

b) How does the composition of the poor (focusing on children and the elderly) vary according to the choice of equivalence scale?  To answer this question, compare the percentage of children (defined as under 18) and the percentage of the elderly (defined those aged 65 and older) among the poor. Use net household income, and a relative poverty line that is 60% of the median.  Use three different equivalence scales of your choice.                                                                                [8]

c) Explain any assumptions that you are making in your analysis for a) and b).       [3] 

                                                                                                                                      [TASK 1 total: 25]

TASK 2: EDUCATION

Task 2 asks you to analyse educational achievement data from PISA.

Analysis of PISA data (Note: please provide your Stata do-file in the Appendix.)

Your task is to examine the educational achievement of 15 year olds in Denmark.  The data set is called “PISA_2012_DEN”, a reduced version of the PISA 2012 data set.  See the following table for a description of the variables in the data:

Variable name	Description
country	=DEN for Denmark
stidstd	Unique student identifier
schoolid	Unique school identifier and Primary Sampling Unit
w_fstuwt	Student weight variable – please use for all the calculations
math	PISA achievement score (mean of the 5 plausible values) – this is your dependent variable
sex	Sex:  1= female, 2=male
hisei	Ganzeboom index, continuous variable. Higher values indicate higher parental socio-economic status
hisced	Highest educational level of parents ( 2-ISCED 2 or lower; 3-ISCED 3b,c; 4-ISCED 3a,4;  5-ISCED 5b; 6-ISCED 5a,6)
immig	Immigration status (1: native; 2: second generation migrant; 3: first generation migrant)
fjob	The current job status of the father of the student: 1=Full-time, 2=part-time; 3:=Not working, but looking for a job; 4= Other (inc. stay-at-home)

a) Estimate the population mean and population standard deviation of math and of hisei.  [2]

b) Use regression to describe the relationship between PISA math achievement and three variables:  hisei, hisced and immig

· First consider each of these three variables separately, in three different regression models.

· Then, in a fourth regression model, include each of these three variables together in the same model.

Present the results of the four models in one single table that includes all important information in a way that results of the regressions can be easily compared.    [6]

c) Interpret the results from your models in b).        [8] 

[TASK 2 total: 16]

TASK 3: SOCIAL MOBILITY

Parts a)-c) do not require you to conduct your own data analysis but ask you to interpret existing analysis of BCS data; part d) asks you to reflect on the literature on social mobility.

Interpretation of British Cohort Study analysis

Here we examine social mobility, based on existing analysis of the UK British Cohort Study (BCS; 1970) data set.  The following page contains a log of Stata output from analysis of these BCS data.  The table below contains a description of the relevant variables.  

Variable name	Description
bcsid	BCS id number
b34soc	Social Class: Individual’s Job at Age 34 (1- unskilled; 2-partly skilled; 3-skilled manual; 4-skilled non-manual; 5-managerial/technical; 6- professional).
bsex	Individual’s gender: 1-male; 2-female
b10fsoc	Social Class: Occupation of Father when individual aged 10 (1- unskilled; 2-partly skilled; 3-skilled manual; 4-skilled non-manual; 5-managerial/technical; 6- professional).
b34hq5	Highest academic qualification at age 34 (0-none; 1–cse; 2–gce o level/gcse; 3-a level/ssce/a-s level; 4-degree/ dip. h.ed; 5-higher degree/pgce)

Answer the following questions.

a) Interpret the results of the analysis on the following page.                                                 [6]

b) Describe, using no more than 150 words, the quality of this empirical evidence as an assessment of social mobility in the UK.      [3]

c) How would you use this dataset to assess whether social mobility in the UK varies by an individual’s gender?      [3]