LING10001 The Secret Life of Language Assignment 2
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
The Secret Life of Language (LING10001)
Assignment 2 (alternative)
Distributed: 28th August 2023 Due: 10th September 2023
Topic: Semantics and Pragmatics
This is an individual assignment. The analysis you present must be all your own work. You may consult the subject reader, textbook and lecture and tutorial notes, but you must not use any other resources or complete the assignment with other students. Assignment responses should be submitted online using the LMS Quiz. |
Question 1 – Meaning relations
For each of the following pairs of words, choose the sense relation which best describes their semantic relationship: synonymy, hyponymy, gradable antonymy, complementary pair (non-gradable antonymy) or converse antonymy (relational opposites).
a) firm-soft
b) teacher-student
c) automobile-car
d) borrow-lend
e) healthy-unwell
f) automobile-vehicle
g) athlete-cyclist
h) forbidden-permitted
Question 2 – Conversational Implicature and Grice’s maxims
Each of the following exchanges relies on a conversational implicature. Your task is to: (i) describe the implicature involved, and (ii) state which maxim of the Co-operative Principle is relevant to generating the implicature, and explain your answer. [Note:
sometimes it may seem that more than one maxim is involved. You need only provide the main maxim for each question.]
1. A: Did you get hold of Paula yet?
B: I tried to call her yesterday.
2. A: What did you think of the film?
B: The popcorn was delicious.
3. A: Do you have any pets?
B: Yes, I have two cats.
4. A: Did you see a surgeon about your foot?
B: I saw a man in a white coat wielding a scalpel.
Question 3 – Entailment and Implicature
For the following pair of utterances identify whether the (b) utterance is related to the (a) utterance by entailment or implicature. If they are connected by entailment, explain why this is necessarily an entailment (e.g. by using the proof-by-contradiction test or showing how the meaning of (b) is included in the meaning of (a)). If they are connected by implicature, describe a context which defeats the implicature.
1. a. Because she’d been naughty, Mary’s dad didn’t give her any dinner.
b. Mary didn’t have any dinner.
2. a. I switched off the light.
b. I tried to switch off the light.
3. a. Many students in the class like syntax.
b. At least half of the students in the class like syntax.
4. a. John regrets eating the whole block of chocolate.
b. John ate the whole block of chocolate.
2023-09-11
Semantics and Pragmatics