Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

School of Business

EXAMINATION

Semester One Final Examinations, 2022

IBUS7302 Operating International Business

ANSWER FOUR (4) OF THE SIX (6) QUESTIONS

Please provide clear and comprehensive answers in an essay format, not exceeding 600 words for each whole question. Bullet point answers will be worth a fraction of the marks allocated.

The questions may have multiple parts (e.g., A, B, C, D). You must answer all parts of each question to receive full marks.

All questions are worth equal marks.  Each question will be marked out of 12.5 points.

Question 1.

Firms engage in business in international markets to derive advantage from their special attributes which earn them revenue in these foreign markets.  They do not all adopt the same strategy in these foreign markets.   However, they all confront a liability of foreignness overseas.

(A) What is a liability of foreignness, and offer an example to assist in this explanation? (2.5 marks)

(B) List the possible strategies a firm can adopt in a foreign market, giving an example of each?  (4 marks).

(C) Internalisation theory is possibly the most widely acknowledged explanation in the International Business field that explains the nature of the traditional multinational enterprise.   Explain

internalisation theory as it relates to the multinational enterprise. (4 marks).

(D) How does internalisation theory differ from internationalisation process theory? (2 marks).

Question 2

In detail, discuss how Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) differs between how the traditional multinational enterprise (MNE) operationalised it versus how the new Global Factory operationalises it?

(A) Discuss how FDI has been operating in a traditional MNE. (4 points)

(B) Discuss how FDI would operate in the modern global factory. (3 points)

(C) Discuss the three major decision elements in the FDI process. (3 points)

(D) Explain why FDI is still a central part of international business. (2.5 points)

.     Provide examples for a, b, c and d.

Question 3.

In detail, discuss the Hummus Bar case and how Uri Gotlibovich's experiences in general and with the

Hummus Bar uniquely illustrate the Johanson & Vahlne’s (1977) “Uppsala Model of Internationalisation”, domestically and internationally.

(A) Discuss in detail the major concepts of Johanson & Vahlne’s (1977) model. (6.25 points)

(B)  Illustrate how Uri Gotlibovich's experiences in general and with the Hummus Bar corroborate

Johanson & Vahlne’s (1977) model domestically and internationally.  You need to provide specific examples from Uri Gotlibovich's experiences. (6.25 points)

Question 4.

Consider the firm in terms of a value chain.

(A) Discuss the difference between primary activities and support activities. (3 points) (B) Provide examples of each. (3 points)

(C) Discuss how national differences influence an international business firm’s support activities, providing clear examples. (6.5 points) 

Question 5.

Assume you are the HR director for a small company that has begun to use international assignments. You are considering using an external consulting firm to provide pre-departure training for employees, as you do not have the resources to provide this ‘in-house’ .

(A) First, address the reasons for the significance of a pre-departure training program for employees and their respective family members. (3.5 points)

(B) Second, what components will you need to address in the training? (3 points)

(C) Third, what are some of the contextual, situational, and individual difference variables that may directly or indirectly influence a pre-departure training program? (3 points)

(D) Finally, address why some Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) appear reluctant to provide access to training programs. (3 points)

Question 6.

TNA Australia provides innovative production solutions for the global processing and packaging industry. It was founded by Alf and Nadia Taylor in 1982 and today has operations across the world.  The firm, which maintains a manufacturing base in Melbourne, Australia, utilises innovation in a traditional manufacturing sector to follow a strategy of incremental internationalisation that has seen it become the biggest player in its industry worldwide.

The company spent much of the 1980s installing machines for the Australian potato chip manufacturer Smith’s chips. At the end of 1989, the TNA team congratulated themselves on their achievements at     Smith Chips. However, they also looked into the economics behind their venture. As Australia had only 20 million people, they realised there was a limit to the amount of chips such a small population could   consume. This led them to become involved in international markets. They approached Austrade, the   Australian Trade Commission, and were provided with a very small export development grant. This allowed TNA to set up TNA Europe.

Alf Taylor went to the UK and set up a small office in England with two employees. He chose the UK and Europe for the firm’s first overseas venture, as he believed the technical aspects of the firm’s product were suited to this region. The company needed to consider the easiest path to success when financing its internationalisation, Taylors says, as each stage of expansion was used to finance the next stage.

This is a model that TNA has continued to implement as it has expanded globally. The UK market initially offered fewer hurdles for TNA. For example, the idiosyncratic differences between English and Australian firms using packaging machines were lower than they were in other parts of the world. Europe had slightly larger discrepancies, but the lack of compatibility with TNA in the US meant that this was an extremely difficult market to enter initially. TNA Australia’s first sale in the UK was with Walkers, a company that is now part of the PepsiCo Group. After the UK, TNA launched into Continental Europe which they mastered in six years.

Alf Taylor believes that having a strategically oriented global mindset was a key factor in TNA’s ability to move into the global marketplace. In the packaging industry, there are probably only about 20 competitors worldwide. The industry is worth approximately AU$1 billion, a relatively small industry in

Taylor’s view. TNA sought to gain an advantage over its competitors by employing suitable strategies for the industry environment. Importantly, the company analysed its competitors and determined that the competition collectively suffered from a lack of vision, such that the industry believed there was a physical limitation to what was possible with packaging machines. This provided TNA with confidence that if it implemented a grand vision, it would be able to dominate its competitors, whom it determined were extremely parochial. For example, the US packaging suppliers did most of their business in the

United States, the Germans operated in Germany, and so on.  TNA’s insight was that this made no sense from a business perspective; it didn’t matter where in the world a product was being packaged, the packaging requirement shouldn’t be different – they were correct. Today, 95% of TNA’s revenue is from    its offshore business.

Alf Taylor describes the initial process of market entry: “Banging on doors and it was just hard slogging ... We had no money and we hired a van, stuck a machine in the back of a van and drove it around and put  it in people’s factories, and ran trials. You sit there and philosophise and give them the laws of physics like there is no tomorrow, and they don’t believe any of it. But as soon as you sit the gear in their factory  and run their product on that machine and show them how efficient that is, it’s doing double the speed ... So if you managed to get them to let you go in with a machine at no cost to them, then you had a pretty   good chance of getting in.”

Reflect on TNA Australia Pty Ltd. case above on international entry strategy and alliances and answer all the following questions.

(A) TNA has chosen to retain its production of packaging machinery exclusively in Australia. What do you think are the advantages to TNA in doing this? (3 points)

(B) What might the drawbacks be? (3 points)

(C) Does the strategy of production in Australia make sense? Why – justify your answer? (3.5 points)

(D) What advantages has TNA’s entry into the markets it has chosen provided for its international expansion? (3 points)