Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

Principles of Microeconomic Theory 1: Problem set 5.

Part A:Multiple choice questions.

Question 1. suppose that preferences over bundles of goods are represented by:

U(q1 , q2 ) = min {q1 , q2 } .

The consumer faces prices p1 , p2 > 0. Then, the expenditure function associated with these preferences is given by:

(a) E(p1 , p2 , U) = U.

(b) E(p1 , p2 , U) = min {p1 U, p2 U }.

(c) E(p1 , p2 , U) = p1 U.

(d) E(p1 , p2 , U) =(p1 + p2 ) U.

(e) E(p1 , p2 , U) = .

Question 2. A consumer,s expenditure function is given by:

E(p1 , p2 , u) = 2u4p1 4p2 .

Then, the Hicksian compensated demand for good 1 is given by which one of the following?

(a) q1  = 2u4p2 .

1

(b) q1  = u 2 .

(c) q1  = u 2 .

(d) q1  = p2 .

(e) q1  = 2u.

Question 3. which one of the following statements is incorrect?

(a) If Hicksian demand is steeper than Marshallian demand, then 'cV' > 'EV' .

(b) If Hicksian demand is latter than Marshallian demand, then 'cV' < 'EV' .

(c) For normal goods it must hold that 'cV' > 'EV' .

(d) For normal goods, it must hold that 'cV' < 'EV' .

(e) For inferior goods, it must hold that 'cV' < 'EV' .

Part B:written answer question.

Question 4. suppose that a consumer,s preferences are represented by:

U(q1 , q2 ) =“q1 q2 .

The consumer has income Y = f2, 400. Initially, the prices of goods 1 and 2 are p1  = f30 and p2  = f40.

A shock to the economy raises the price of good 1 by 50%.

Measure the welfare impact of this shock using the compensating variation approach.