Biological Psychology (PSYC20006)
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
Lab report marking guide
Biological Psychology (PSYC20006)
Overview
The aim of this 1500-word lab report is to investigate whether the primary motor cortex (M1) is causally involved in mental rotation of Shepard figures (Shepard & Metzler, 1971) and hands (Bode et al., 2007). We will use the neural noise TMS approach to interrupt processing of M1 during a mental rotation task. We will compare mean reaction times (RTs) for real TMS and sham TMS conditions for each experimental condition (Shepard figures and hands) using the relevant statistical tests.
Due date
The lab report is due in by 8:00 am on Friday, 21st April (Week 7).
Word limit
The 1500-word limit for the lab report includes the Abstract, Introduction, Results, Discussion, and in-text citations. The 10% word-limit penalty applies as per the Student Manual. The following items are not included in the word limit but are expected:
• The Method. Students will be provided with the Method section which will help with understanding what was done in this “experiment” .
• Other report elements. Heading, sub-headings, tables, title page, and the reference list.
Readings
The two papers below are required readings for the lab report. These two papers will give you a strong grounding in mental rotation research using TMS. Beyond these two papers, it will be up to you to decide what information to include in your introduction. We have provided you with some further readings to get you started. These are available on the Canvas website under the Assessments module. You are also encouraged to include other papers you may come across while researching on search engines such as the University of Melbourne Library, Google Scholar, or PubMed.
Eisenegger, C., Herwig, U., & Jäncke, L. (2007). The involvement of primary motor cortex in mental rotation revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. European Journal ofNeuroscience, 25(4), 1240– 1244.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05354.x
Bode, S., Koenecke, S., & Jäncke, L. (2007). Different strategies do not moderate primary motor cortex involvement in mental rotation: A TMS study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744- 9081-3-38
Assessment criteria
A. Title and Abstract |
Weight |
||
A1. Title Content • Clearly and concisely outlines the main topic of the research, including the relationship between key variables. |
1% |
||
A2. Abstract (Background) |
• Describes the problem under investigation (i.e., the research topic). |
1% |
|
A3. Abstract (Method) • Describes relevant sample characteristics (e.g., number of participants, age, gender composition) and essential features of the study method (e.g., study design, outcome measures, data- gathering and analysis procedures). |
1% |
||
A4. Abstract (Results) • Describes the main findings, including effect sizes and statistical significance levels (i.e., p values), where appropriate. |
1% |
||
A5. Abstract (Discussion) • Discusses the implications of the study’s findings with regard to the problem under investigation. |
1% |
||
B. Introduction |
Weight |
||
B1. Opening • Opens by introducing the problem under investigation and outlining its importance. |
5% |
||
B2. Literature Review (Relevance and Understanding) |
• Provides a succinct and focused review of literature relevant to the problem. • Summarises key background information accurately and in appropriate detail. |
10% |
|
B3. Literature Review (Rationale) |
• Develops a cogent rationale by critically evaluating the literature and explaining how the current study builds on prior research. |
10% |
|
B4. Aims and Hypotheses • Outlines the purpose and scope of the study and generates 5% specific hypotheses for testing. |
|||
C. Method |
Weight |
||
C1. Participants • Describes the participants involved in the research. In most cases, this includes: - number of participants in total and in relevant subgroups - descriptive statistics for years of age - gender composition of the sample - other major demographic characteristics as warranted by the study - eligibility and exclusion criteria |
0% |
||
C2. Materials and Measures |
• Describes all outcome measures, and the materials used to derive them, with sufficient detail to facilitate reproducibility. |
0% |
|
C3. Procedure and Design |
• Describes the procedures that were carried out in the study, including a detailed outline of how participants were allocated to groups or conditions and the specific steps involved in collecting and analysing data. |
0% |
D. Results |
Weight |
||
D1. Statistical Information |
• Presents all relevant statistical information accurately and 5% completely. |
||
D2. Presentation • Describes the results of each analysis appropriately and presents 10% |
|||
statistical and mathematical information in correct APA Style |
|||
format. |
|||
• Presents results in an organised manner, following the structure |
|||
set by the study’s design and the order of the aims and |
|||
hypotheses. |
|||
• Avoids making interpretive comments that are better suited for |
|||
the Discussion (e.g., interpreting what the result means for the |
|||
hypotheses stated in the Introduction). |
|||
D3. Tables and Figures • Presents at least one table or figure which is referred to and 5% |
|||
described appropriately in text. |
|||
• Tables/figures conform to the requirements of APA Style. |
|||
• Each table/figure serves a purpose and does not merely duplicate |
|||
information contained in the text or in another table or figure. |
|||
E. Discussion |
Weight |
||
E1. Hypotheses • Opens with a clear statement summarising the aims and hypotheses and indicating whether the hypotheses were supported or not. |
5% |
||
E2. Interpretation • Considers how the study’s findings are similar to or different from 15% |
|||
|
2023-06-17
Lab report marking guide