Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

ACCFIN5233

Financial Information Retrieval with Python

Option 1. Sentiment analysis of stocks and its comparison with fundamental analysis.

You and your teammate have just started your new job with an investment company. You have been asked to analyze a specific stock using innovative data and methods (such as python). Further they want you also compare your results with some more traditional methods. In the middle of your project the company asked you to make a 10 min. presentation to explain the progress in each question (note that by the time of the presentation you don’t have to fully finish questions).

1. (5%) Select a publicly traded firm. Using python, find the firm’s share prices for last 10 years. Collect information about 5 firm’s indicators related to fundamental analysis for the same period of time. You need to pick up a firm that has social media activity for later tasks below.

See marking schema for python file at the end

Also related to Lecture 1 materials about traditional methods.

2. (25%, 1000 words) Do social media sentiment/news about the company influence the firm’s share price. Provide the literature review related to this topic. The review should include both theoretical and empirical papers.

See marking schema for written questions at the end

Related to Lecture 1

3. (10%, 200 words). Describe a parameter/index related to previous question which you think it is interesting and important to consider with regard to your company.

Related to Lectures 2-5. Also see marking schema for written questions

4. (20%). Collect information which is necessary in order to calculate the parameter described in previous question for last 10 years.

Related to Lectures 2-5. Also see marking schema for python file

5. (40%, 1300 words). Compare the firm’s share price movements, rates of return or other parameters with the parameter/index from question 3 and 4. Jointly with all information above, critically discuss the relationship between relevant factors such social media sentiment and fundamental information. alongside with the firm’s peers’ social media sentiment (at least 2 other firms to be compared with). Visualize your data using python; use graphs etc. Use additional fundamental or other information if necessary. Compare the effect of sentiment index and fundamental parameters on share price before the COVID crisis and during/after the crisis. Has it increased/decreased?! Discuss possible reason for a change. Discuss limitations of your analysis.

See marking schema for written questions and python questions

Related to all lectures

Option 2. Performance indicators of crowdfunding campaign

You and your teammate have been hired by an innovative firm that intends to  raise funds using crowdfunding. They are interested to know what factors of crowdfunding campaign are important. You an your employer agree that you will find a crowdfunding platform and use its data to perform your task. In the middle of your project the company asked you to make a 10 min presentation to explain the progress in each question (note that by the time of the presentation you don’t have to fully finish questions).

1.  Describe  the  concept  of  crowdfunding  and  discuss  what  factors  determine  the  success  of crowdfunding campaign. Provide the literature review related to this topic. The review should include both theoretical and empirical papers.

See marking schema for written questions at the end

Related to Lecture 1 and 5

2. Select a crowdfunding platform. Describe factors which are going to analyse in this project related to crowdfunding projects on this platform. Describe the parameter of campaign success. The platform should have data necessary to perform all tasks below.

See marking schema for written questions

3.  Using python, collect information about factors described in previous question.

See marking schema for python file at the end

4.  Compare  the  campaign’s  success  parameter  with  the  different  factors  described  previously. Visualize your data; use graphs etc. Use additional information if necessary. Compare the effect of factors on campaign success before the crisis and during/after the crisis. Has it changed?! Discuss possible reason for a change. Alternatively select two countries and compare the results for different countries. Discuss possible reasons for the difference. Discuss limitations of your results.

See marking schema for written questions and python questions

Related to all lectures

Assessment criteria

Presentation evaluation criteria

Area

Perce ntage

Indicative criteria

Presenta-

tion

materials

(e.g. PPT)

quality and

attractive-

ness

10

8- 10

Very attractive materials including title slide, agenda, background, graphical images, numbers and tables

6-7

Attractive overall with several minor improvements possible

3-5

Major improvements are possible

0-2

Poor quality



Content

20

15-20

A very good progress is demonstrated in all questions with deep and comprehensive understanding of          literature, existing theory, methods used and grasp of issues. A very good level of innovativeness and           creativity is demonstrated. A very good understanding of python opportunities is clearly demonstrated

10- 14

A clear presentation and analysis of the case. Some  comprehension of the relevance to financial theory. Several minor improvements are possible. A               satisfactory level of innovativeness and creativity is    demonstrated. A satisfactory understanding of python opportunities is demonstrated

5-9

A limited quality presentation and analysis of the case. Major improvements are possible

0 - 4

Poor quality.

Main

delivery

40

30-40

Very good quality delivery. The progress on the project is clearly demonstrated in all questions. Good level of  understanding is demonstrated. Both teammates are   actively involved.

20-29

Satisfactory delivery. Some improvements are possible in terms of explanations regarding the progress on the project. Satisfactory level of understanding is                 demonstrated. Both teammates are involved.

10- 19

A limited quality delivery. Major improvements are possible

0 - 9

Poor quality

Answering questions

20

15-20

Very good quality answers. Good level of confidence Smooth answers

10- 14

Satisfactory answers.

5-9

Major improvements are possible, e.g.: major               hesitations, low confidence, mistakes when answering etc.