Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

Nonparametric solutions

MGT223 Business Statistics

Question 1

Independent samples t-test

Assumptions:

· Independent random samples - two separate samples so definitely independent.  Will have to assume the random element.

· Interval/ratio data – electricity consumption in KWH – a ratio measure.

· Normality (sample sizes < 30) – check below

· Also need to check equal variances as part of the test.

Checking the assumption of normality:

Descriptives

Insulation

Statistic

Std. Error

Consumption

Experimental

Mean

7890.14

748.765

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound

6057.98

Upper Bound

9722.31

5% Trimmed Mean

7954.49

Median

8022.00

Variance

3924545.810

Std. Deviation

1981.047

Minimum

4307

Maximum

10315

Range

6008

Interquartile Range

3008

Skewness

-.822

.794

Kurtosis

1.034

1.587

Control

Mean

10976.75

907.114

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound

8831.77

Upper Bound

13121.73

5% Trimmed Mean

11017.11

Median

11387.50

Variance

6582853.357

Std. Deviation

2565.707

Minimum

6584

Maximum

14643

Range

8059

Interquartile Range

3724

Skewness

-.480

.752

Kurtosis

-.084

1.481

Experimental: Skewness -0.822 (s.e. = 0.794); Kurtosis: 1.034 (s.e.= 1.587)

Control: Skewness -0.480 (s.e. = 0752); Kurtosis: -0.084 (s.e.= 1.481)

No evidence of skewness or kurtosis in populations for either group (ratios all within range -2 to +2).

Tests of Normality

Insulation

Kolmogorov-Smirnova

Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic

df

Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

Consumption

Experimental

.240

7

.200*

.928

7

.537

Control

.167

8

.200*

.969

8

.889

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Shapiro-Wilk test provides no evidence against normality in populations for either group (Experimental: p = 0.537, Control: p = 0.889)

Points lie fairly close to diagonal on normal probability plots.

The boxplot on next page appears to be fairly symmetrical.

No evidence against normality.

Boxplot of Consumption

The boxplot appears to show reduced consumption under experimental conditions.

Consumption under control conditions appears to be more variable.

Both of these observations can be checked formally below.

(i)

T-Test

Group Statistics

INSULATION

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

CONSUMPTION

1 Experimental

7

7890.14

1981.047

748.765

2 Control

8

10976.75

2565.707

907.114

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F

Sig.

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower

Upper

CONSUMPTION

Equal variances assumed

.762

.399

-2.577

13

.023

-3086.607

1197.759

-5674.209

-499.005

Equal variances not assumed

-2.624

12.836

.021

-3086.607

1176.225

-5630.986

-542.228

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

Insulation

N

Mean Rank

Sum of Ranks

Consumption

1 Experimental

7

5.29

37.00

2 Control

8

10.38

83.00

Total

15