Module UFCF7S-30-2 Systems Development Group Project Year 2021-22
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
Module UFCF7S-30-2 Systems Development Group Project
Year 2021-22
Assessment Component B
Individual essay (1000 words) - reflective evaluation of the work, or a 2 minutes video presentation of the reflective evaluation
Contributes – 20% of module marks
Module Learning Outcomes Assessed
MO3 - Conduct themselves in a professional manner and work effectively as a member of a project team
MO5 - Demonstrate awareness of ethical and legal issues in building systems that will be using and processing personal and corporate data
M06 - Contribute to the effective management and completion of a project
Expected points to be discussed
· Reflection on interaction within the project team
o Organisation of the team
o Consistency of attendance at meetings
o Effectiveness of meetings – own contribution
· Consideration and Discussion of ethical (including sustainability) and legal issues (including risks) that are related to the project. Discuss own contribution
· Discuss the following re the management of the project
o Consideration of project tasks – related to project objectives
o Roles identified – did the team do this? Did these roles rotate among members and how?
o Did you review your project plan as part of the weekly meetings?
o Did you consider risks affecting the project? If so, how did you link them to the project plan?
· What do you think was your most important contribution for the project and the group you’ve worked with?
Assessment Criteria and Mark Scheme
Mark |
100-86 Outstanding |
85-70 Excellent |
69-60 Very Good |
59-50 Good |
49-40 Adequate |
39-30 Poor / Inadequate |
29-0 Very Poor |
Reflective Evaluation Assessment - Component B |
· The essay has surpassed expectations at “Excellent” level. · The work demonstrates excellent ability to critically discuss the group work and own contribution. · There has been some good use of appropriate references. · Demonstrates a good appreciation of sustainability issues and ability to link those to the key elements of the system produced. |
· Excellent work in terms of discussing group management practice. · Thorough discussion and analysis of own contribution and personal lessons learned. · Discusses ethical and legal issues effectively · Discusses the impact of Risk management in the management of the project |
· A well-structured discussion of group management practice. · A good attempt to critically discuss role management and rotation. · A good attempt to discuss own contribution · Demonstrates good understanding of the role of risk · Demonstrates good awareness of ethics and legal issues |
· Attempts to discuss the effectiveness of the work of the group. · Describes the roles and the way they were managed by the group. · Explains own role. · Identifies some ethical issues. · Is unclear about the role of risk management for the project |
· Identifies roles among group members. · Explains own role. · Does all the above in a descriptive manner, not being able to comment as to the effectiveness of the work clearly · Some attempt to identify ethical issues |
· Makes some attempt to describe how the project was run and managed. · There is no clarity what roles were assigned to group members · Attempts to describe but unclear as to own contribution |
· Not clear about how the project was planned, tasked and run. · Fails to explain own contribution to the project. |
2023-07-14